>

Call for Papers: Leibniz Environment and Development Symposium (LEADS) 2020

Global societal challenges such as climate change, the loss of biodiversityand nature’s contributions to people, food security for all, decreasing social inequalities and preventing and overcoming violent conflicts require strong interdisciplinary and international research collaboration. Research at the interface of environment and development is often hampered by traditional academic boundaries. New ideas and fresh research approaches are neededto meet such challenges. Young researchers in particular play a key role in doing so.

To address these important research challenges and help overcome these structural barriers within academia, the five German research institutes ATB, GIGA, IGZ, ZALF and ZMT have initiated the Leibniz Environment and Development Symposium (LEADS). The aim of LEADS is to foster exchange on interdisciplinary and international research and stimulate collaboration on global societal challenges among early career researchers and senior scholars. As such LEADS also contributesto the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by the United Nations.

We hereby invite you to join the next LEADS event in Berlin on March 9-10, 2020. We invite submissions of original and unpublished research papers that address at least one of the above mentioned societal challenges. We prefer empirical papers addressing questions at the intersection of socio-economics, ecological and technical studies- and we prefer receiving complete drafts of papers.

There will be ample opportunities for academic discussionand network building. Participants are encouraged to explore new research collaborations.

Please send your submission (in English) and a short CV (maximum two pages) in PDF format by email tomanuel.asbach@zalf.de by 15 January 2020. Decisions will be communicated in the beginning of February 2020. There will be discussants, therefore the finalpapers (completed or draft version) are due by March 1st, 2020. The conference language will be English.

For further information send an email to manuel.asbach@zalf.de.

Academic Committee: Tilman Brück (IGZ), Philipp Grundmann (ATB),
Jann Lay (GIGA), Lasse Loft (ZALF), and Achim Schlüter (ZMT)

Organizing Committee: Lasse Loft (ZALF), Barbara Schröter (ZALF),
Jann Lay (GIGA)

Continue Reading

Tilman Brück and Angela Merkel speaking at a panel discussion of the German Catholic Convention

Tilman Brück was a speaker at the panel discussion “Germany in the Changing World: What can be done about conflict spots and aggressive regimes?” of the German Catholic Convention (Katholikentag). Among other speakers of the discussion were Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, and Cardinal Peter Turkson. The discussion took place in Münster on 11 May 2018. Please see […]

ISDC co-hosts the Fourth Annual Life in Kyrgyzstan conference in Bishkek

The Fourth Annual Life in Kyrgyzstan (LiK) conference took place in Bishkek on 17-18 October 2018. The academic event was attended by over 150 participants from 11 countries. The conference was organised by the University of Central Asia’s (UCA) Institute of Public Policy and Administration (IPPA), Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), and ISDC – International Security and Development Center. […]

Call for Papers: 15th Annual HiCN Workshop “New Methods in Empirical Conflict Research”

In the last 15 years, civil conflict has gradually become an important subject of study for empirical economists. As a result, conflict research has adopted many empirical methods from mainstream economics. Furthermore, there is now a broad consensus that violent political conflict and economic development are intertwined, and a fast-growing literature studies this relationship with micro-data. At the same time, applied research on conflict is increasingly embracing new empirical methods, such as RCTs, geospatial analysis using high-resolution satellite imagery, machine learning methods, big data applications, and the large-scale digitization of archival resources. Each of these research tools has strengths and limitations and is the subject of ongoing methodological debates.